The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is a space telescope specifically designed to conduct infrared astronomy. Its high-resolution and high-sensitivity instruments allow it to view objects too old, distant, or faint for the Hubble Space Telescope. This enables investigations across many fields of astronomy and cosmology, such as observation of the first stars and the formation of the first galaxies, and detailed atmospheric characterization of potentially habitable exoplanets. The U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) led Webb's design and development and partnered with two main agencies: the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). The NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in Maryland managed telescope development, while the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore on the Homewood Campus of Johns Hopkins University operates Webb. The primary contractor for the project was Northrop Grumman. The telescope is named after James E. Webb, who was the administrator of NASA from 1961 to 1968 during the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

The World Will Stand Up To China's Aggression; China's Misadventure Against India Could Cost it Dearly

The recent tweet by a Chinese State TV channel that Chinese ground troops could enter New Delhi in 48 hours or Chinese paratroops could land in India in 10 hours flat should not be taken lightly. The Chinese are testing the waters through their front organisation to the effect that they want to assess what the Indian reaction is. To this, the Indian stand should be unequivocal and unflinchingly non evasive. India takes every threat seriously, even if it’s made by a front organisation of a known Indian baiter like China.

China’s world view is quite different than that of India. With a GDP five times India’s size and a military power nearly thrice that of India, China sees itself in the league of Russia, EU and US. It wants to and will resist US domination more for ideological and historical reasons than for economic reasons. In a world which is retracting from globalisation and pushing towards protectionism, China in its quest for world domination is putting its bets on more globalisation and muti-lateralism. No wonder, China’s investment-led economic model is clearly under strain.

A McKinsey Global Institute study says a more productivity-led and domestic consumer-driven economy could add $5 trillion to the Chinese GDP and household income in the next 10-15 years time. In Q4FY16, China’s GDP grew by 6.8 per cent, bringing last year’s average GDP growth to 6.7 per cent. As a result, soon after the data was released, the iShares China Large-Cap exchange-traded fund (FXI) slipped 0.4 per cent. Rob Lutts, CIO of Cabot Wealth Management in Salem, Mass., after returning from a 10-day trip to Beijing told Barrons.com: “It is not reasonable for China to grow at 6 per cent or 7 per cent, but the government has doubled the amount of debt to GDP over the past five years, and got a lot of juice out of that. I think 5 per cent GDP is where China is headed by 2020. China is slowing.”

China and India will continue to be engines of global growth with the UN saying India GDP will grow at 7.3 per cent in 2017. But what are the ramifications for a slowing China on India? Clearly China is getting fidgety and nervous. Being already included as a high middle income country with a 11.3 crore middle class earning $22,000 or more, China aspires to be in the league of advanced nations. This quest is making it claim Taiwan, the South China sea (rich in oil/gas reserves), its inroads into Indian ocean through port-building activities in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Myanmar. It has augmented its naval fleet in the Indian Ocean to protect the flow of commodities like oil, minerals, agricultural produce on which it is so much more dependent.

Major powers across the world do not resent rather they welcome China’s rise as a economic world power but should it turn into aggression and coercion, then the world will stand up and take note. In its quest for world domination, China has played some dirty trade games. The US has branded China as a currency manipulator and the weak Chinese renminbi has created a huge trade deficit with the US and major trading partners. China has warned trading countries that protectionist measures could aggravate the trade wars further.

Where does India stand in this game of thrones? India under our dynamic and able PM Modiji has taken some very bold and assertive steps sending a clear message to China that while India will extend respect to China, it will not be cowed down by it. Some of these steps include: strengthening the border road network; proposal to set up a regiment of Brahmos cruise missile in Arunachal Pradesh, raising of 3-4 additional mountain attack infantry brigades, going in for purchase of advanced weapons especially for the navy and placing order for long-range artillery guns, assault helicopters and next gen advanced fighter jets.

So how much does the claim by the state run Chinese TV channel hold sway? A Chinese military aggression on India could come at heavy cost to the country! Here’s why: While China has built strong rail, road networks in the regions around the Himalayan states, a land invasion could not be to China’s advantage. At most China could move 50 per cent of its troops to India’s border and leave 50 per cent to guard against the borders with Russia, Mongolia, Japan, Taiwan, Phillippines, Vietnam, etc.  Further, China’s weapons are untested, copied and archaic and its troops don’t have much real life combat experience compared to a battle-hardened Indian military and its state-of-the-art weapon systems.

Even in the event of an aerial war, the Indian Air Force could give China a good fight because it has tested arsenal unlike China’s untested and obsolete war planes. But where India could pip China would be in the sea lanes from the Bay of Bengal to the Malacca straits. China is super dependent on the Indian ocean sea routes to transfer its supplies of crude oil, commodities for its ever-expanding economy. A superior Indian naval fleet could easily blockade Chinese ship movement and cause irreparable damage to its economy.

In this context, a cautionary warning to India by a top American military commander recently on China’s growing Indian Ocean presence is well timed. In this light nothing could be more urgent then signing two key agreements between India and the US for joint tracking. Admiral Harry B Harris, who heads the US Pacific Command (PACOM), termed Chinese submarine forays into the Indian Ocean an "issue" and said signing of the Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) will help in joint tracking.

"Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) is a clear indicator of progress. There are other foundational agreements like COMCASA and Basic Exchange and the Cooperation Agreement for Geospatial Information and Services Cooperation (BECA). These are important foundational agreements. If we get these agreements signed, I think we will be at great place,” the Admiral said. India should not delay the signing of both these treaties. Otherwise, a belligerent and aggressive China breathing down India’s neck will become a source of pain and discomfort for a long time to come.





No comments:

Post a Comment

FEATURED POST

A ROADMAP FOR INDIA: 2020 AD – 2050 AD

WHAT DO WE WANT INDIA TO BE IN 2050 AD •ONE OF THE MAJOR GLOBAL POWERS •$20 TRILLION ECONOMY BY GDP, PER CAPITA GDP AT $15,400 •MIXED ...

ALL TIME FAVOURITE POSTS